Frank Swygert wrote: > If you want to do something like this you can go one better -- the 4.7L V-8. Look at it closely and you'll see that it has as much (or more) in common with the AMC V-8 than previous Chrysler designs. Story is that it was designed mainly by former AMC engineers (Jeep Engineering), and that's why it was first available in the Jeep Grand Cherokee. Should be a good tow engine, and you can get some old Classic "287" emblems to put on the fenders! Everyone I know of with the 4.7L seems to like it... I think Mark Price has one. More at http://allpar.com/mopar/47.html I'd have to second this notion too. There's several pluses for the 4.7/287ci V8: * Will fit easier. * Rumored to be AMC/Jeep designed. * Is U.S. manufactured, in Detroit. Hemis are built in Saltillo, MX. (Only engines currently built in the still- operating Kenosha engine plant are V6es). * Cap-less bottom end said to be bulletproof. It runs incredibly smooth. * Cam/induction kits can get you well up into the 300hp range as bolt ons, and there's other tricks you can do. Since it's OHC, cam swaps are easy. * Designed to be coupled with the 45RFE transmission, which was intended for modest towing loads. They're found on WJ/WK Grand Cherokees, 2000-and-up Durangos and Dakotas, later Ram pickups (2002+?), and a few Magnums and 300s. If you look for one, be sure to get one set up without the CA smog package; that one uses a tri-catalyst setup with 4 o2 sensors. The non-CA version uses a single catalyst with 2 sensors, and will be much easier to retrofit into an older car. I have a non-H.O. one in a Dakota, and after several years with it, have really grown to admire it. Only squawks have been minor; plugged idle circuit, oil sender, popped You could also have a lot of fun with a stroked 4.0 (and it'll pull an amazing amount stock), but it won't rumble like a V8. -steve c. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list