" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " " The smart, but hard to do, and "not cost effective" to people who wanna " profit quarter to quarter (reality? time to change that "reality"), is " to use the energy that just literally drops on the ground, a few " kilowatts per square yard, about half the day. solar power satellites. search for 'gerard k. o'neill'... the startup costs and lead time bring new meaning to the word 'staggering', but the long term payoff is too. this has been floating around - so to speak - since the mid '70s with no real action, but i recently read somewhere that the dod is getting interested, presumably for a secure, uninterruptable, and unlimited battlefield power source. that doesn't mean their work wouldn't pay off for the rest of us -- remember, they funded development of the internet. i agree, there's no one replacement for oil. i mentioned butanol solely with respect to gasoline and the existing fleet of vehicles. biodiesel is better and diesel power could easily be rolled into the production stream. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list