Re: [Amc-list] proper transmission lube, was Re: T-96 woes...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] proper transmission lube, was Re: T-96 woes...
- From: Ken Ames <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:35:26 -0600
nnb. Actually, bronze is copper/tin. : )
Ken
Quoting "(Sandwich Maker)" <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
> "
> " Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> " > Follow the link.
> " >
> " > http://www.jeepsunlimited.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8261620
> " >
> " > Most of the reasoning is covered.
> "
> " There's an excellent post in there (twmattox) (with those foolish things
> " I think called "facks") which reminds me of one of the critical deciding
> " factors in gear oil: is there brass/bronze in there, or not?
> "
> " * Old transmissions (T-96...) with plain bearings and brass synchronizer
> " gears CANNOT use "extreme pressure" additives, eg. anything with sulphur
> " (sulphates, etc) as those EAT COPPER AND ZINC METAL (that's in
> " brass/bronze).
> "
> " * That's a separate issue from the viscosity choice stuff that's partly
> " subjective and use-based.
> " _______________________________________________
>
> also true of some newer trannies. i don't recall if it's the ax15 or
> nv3550 or both, but jeep/chrysler expressly forbids use of gl5 gear
> lube and specs gl4, for this reason. gl5 will eat those synchros.
>
> nb. brass is copper/zinc; bronze is copper/lead.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay the genius nature
> internet rambler is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin