Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hey, I actualy take some little offense on the square car comments... > Ever look at a 66-69 American? > If the square headligths would have been legal they's have been in there! Them's fite-en werdz! First, I don't consider the American's square. Second, I apologize if I got too mean, I was funin'. It's obviously just taste. Some of us got bad taste (ducks for cover). > I've slept on the Renault Wasn't that kinda uncomfortable? > I know that there is no way it should be even started without a timing belt and idler pulleys being replaced. > The only price I found mentioned abot $150 for the belt alone state side. Yeah, the old interesting cars are always a mess that way. It's tough. Is any of the driveline etc "common"? A few tough maint spots might not be too bad if suspension etc is doable. > I did find enough to see it truly qualifies as an Orphaned child! Less support for those than our Ramblers! We have, at least, decades of interchangable parts on our side. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list