Re: [Amc-list] 232 combustion chamber - No Squish
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] 232 combustion chamber - No Squish
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:39:11 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
"
"
" No closed or flat area at all.
" They look alot like the 70 Ford Clevelane open chamber heads.
d'oh! i forgot - '70, right?
the '64-7 head was closed chamber, 56cc iirc. '68-'76, 66cc open.
'77-'80 [at least], 74cc open. pistons are different for each; by my
calc '77-9 slugs actually have 6cc less dish than '68-'76.
only the '68-'70 199 had flattops.
as both 199 and 232 have zero deck but 258 is 'down the hole', the
'80-'90 slugs fit only 258s and bring it back to zero deck. also, i
don't have numbers but as the '80s progressed, chamber vol got smaller
again.
" I was thinking of building a high compression stroker for the American, but that 27.9 mpg on the last tank kind of makes me want to leave it alone!
" How many people have a 60's semi custom Rambler with efi etc and get that kind of mileage out of it?
" Not many I'll bet!
i bet a stock american with 199 and o/d, with recurved ign and
economaster carb would beat that! not as much fun though.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin