Sandwich Maker wrote: > took me a while, but i finally figured out the reason was air/fuel > distribution. the v8 had a pretty good intake setup but the 6 just > went for cost and wasn't picky. a modern 6 like the 4.0 is at the > other end of this spectrum. This is a good point! Look at the 195.6 (either of them!), then the cast-iron-intake 232; then the 81-up aluminum manifold, then 4.0. Breathing, breathing, breathing. From ad hoc, to designed with care. Bottom end was a no brainer for that application. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list