" From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx " " Is there realy any difference from the external sizing between an SR4 " and a T4? afaik the t4 is just an improved sr4, mostly the same. " I do not think either has an O/D. nope; o/d was the t5. " Pay shipping and $20 and i'll send you a T4, it's even an AMC T4! " " -- " Mark Price " " -------------- Original message ---------------------- " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " > " > " > The SR-4 (1976-1981) might come close to fitting in the T-96 " > hole: " > " > From http://amccf.laatikko.org/tech/amc_manual_trannies.html " > " > # AMC used a multi-pattern bellhousing from the late 70s-'83 which had " > # patterns drilled for T-96,T-14/T-4,T-5 & SR-4. also t150 and i think some t18. afaik the bell lasted later into the '80s ['86?] in jeeps. " > SR-4 is 2" or so longer than the T-96 (w/o OD I assume). THat's " > good; shortening driveshafts is straightforward and fairly " > cheap. Add $25 to buy the two 1.75" wrenches and the "big nut" " > axle is no longer scary. " > " > " > I don't have access to an SR-4, I really wish I did... I have " > enough parts here to completely mock up fitment of one to a " > 195/6/early 232. the sr4/t4/t5 do not share bolt pattern or retainer diameter with the t96 and t14. if you really want one, i still think your best bet is the '94-up mustang t5 with the longer input shaft, and a homegrown adapter plate as i've previously described on the bellhousing. used with v8s only a couple of years but v6s went to '00 or '01 and have a better 5th too. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list