On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Frank Swygert wrote: > The "big nut" drive shaft isn't as bad as everyone is making out. How often do you need to change u-joints? Once every 10 years unless something unusual happens? Yeah, it's just funny. The PITA is -- who the !!#@! has a pair of 1.75" open ended wrenches?!! Soon, me :-) I'll tell ya how it works out. > Everyone is so used to the way things have been done over the > last 40 years that if something is "different" they get all > discombobulated over it. The older I get the more I *LIKE* the oddities. Like trunnion front ends -- if everyone thinks I'm nuts, fine by me, more parts for me to drive my cars on -- trunnion front ends are superior to ball joint designs. It's a BETTER DESIGN (for a tall-fendered car). It cost AMC more to make; BFD today. It is weirder to setup; eh, that's what brains and TSMs are for. Ball joints fall apart when you don't grease them too, only you can go to a store and buy new ones -- so far anyways. Probably not for long. Then you ball-joint fans are screwed! :-) Maybe when I'm done I'll prefer big-nut rears. [Probably not.] If I can only find a replacement seal... :-) There's few things on AMCs I've personally seen that are inherently bad designs -- 70-up door hinges, for example, or 70-up 01 chassis doors that crack and split. The stupid fuse blocks. Wavy-spring seats. Plastic valve covers. Luckily for us, none are deep-design like Vega engines. (The aluminum six doesn't really count. And I still want one :-) _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list