" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Sandwich Maker wrote: " " > just checked my '67 10-50-80 tsm - the regular 3sp described for the " > 232 is a t96. h/d-fleet option was the t86 used with 290s. " " > you're right on the axle though, amc20 all the way. " " That is a truly nutty combination. An axle capable of " withstanding 400hp in series with a transmission barely " tolerating 125hp. What were they thinking?! i can scarcely imagine. if they foresaw selling any number of 6/3sp cars, an appropriate tranny would save money [eg. warrantee work] and reputation; if they didn't expect to sell many, then it wouldn't matter what tranny they used, so again it might as well be a robust one. i assume that fleet sales such as to usaf or taxi cos would either way get the h/d-fleet drivetrain with the t86. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list