On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Bruce Hevner wrote: > Someone posted a few links to the forums on this subject and I read a > good bit of it (there are quite a few photos). I think one of the > posters on that forum summed it up pretty well,,, "over 800 posts on > this thread going back several years and yet not ONE back to back > test,,,common!!!" > While I think the basic idea has merit I REALLY doubt that it can > "reduce the idle speed of an engine using a 280'@.050 cam to 500 RPM" > (as claimed). He is making some absolutely ridicules claims for this > modification! But there are patent issues at stake and that could mean > $$ so there ya go. > I question why this idea has been around for YEARS but NONE of the > Shell engineers had even HEARD of it. And what about the Mfgrs?? Seems > THEY would be interested in it,, heck they are spending MILLIONS trying > all kinds of ideas to reduce emissions and increase fuel economy. > I'll keep an open mind till I see some back to back tests done by an > independent party. Amen. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list