The displacement difference is all due to changes in deck height. There is a 1/8" difference in stroke between the 199 and 232. Adding another 1/8" of stroke with the same bore gets you 232 and 258. Matt Sandwich Maker wrote: > " From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> > " > " The early (pre '71) 232 was stroked (and the deck made higher to match) to make the 258 in '71 (only year of the small bell 258, except in Postal Jeeps) The 199 was also stroked (with the same deck boost) to become the "new" 232. No-one has had the definitive answer as to whether it was intentionally kept at 232 cubic inches (so as to not lose loyal customers) or a fluke. (combination of both?) > > i always thought they did it simply by putting the long 199 rods on > the 232 crank and raising the deck to match, then coming up with a new > crank for the 232 rods and calling that a 258. > > it's a fact that 258 and early 232 rods match dimensions; 199, late > 232, and 4.0 rods also match. 290-360 v8 rods also match the 258's > but with narrower big ends. > ________________________________________________________________________ > Andrew Hay the genius nature > internet rambler is to see what all have seen > adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > > > -- mhaas@xxxxxxx Cincinnati, OH http://www.mattsoldcars.com 1967 Rambler American wagon 1968 Rambler American sedan ================================================================= According to a February 2003 survey of Internet holdouts released by UCLA's Center for Communication Policy, people cite not having a computer as the No. 1 reason they won't go online. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list