You are absolutely correct! I totally forgot about both issues, which would need to be addressed if ordering lines. In 65 199 and 195.6 powered cars used Bendix, only the (somewhat rare) 232 powered cars used Wagners (or at least that's what the TSM says -- we all know there were exceptions!). I didn't think about the power brake issue either, but those aren't exactly common on Americans either, and I don't think they were available on the SC/Rambler (would just require changing the two feed lines between junction block and MC though). All 69 Ramblers (American/Rogue was just called "Rambler" in 69) used Bendix brakes, so that info will help! The only 69 to use Wagners was the (AMC) Rebel six cylinder sedan and hardtop built in Kenosha (Canadian models used Bendix) ------------ Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:05:15 -0500 From: Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx> Frank Swygert wrote: <snip> > > Just order lines for an SC/Rambler if they don't have your car listed. All the American/Rogue/SC lines are pretty much the same. > </snip> Yeah, but pretty much the same means doesn't work without modifications. Using V8 rear brake lines on a six cylinder car isn't that big of a deal since you only have to account for a half inch difference in wheel cylinder height (9" vs 10" drums) but I can tell you from personal experience that there is no way the engine compartment lines from a car with a Bendix master cylinder will fit a car with a Wagner master cylinder. Also, lines for power brake cars will not fit manual brake cars. There are inches of difference. -- Frank Swygert Publisher, "American Motors Cars" Magazine (AMC) For all AMC enthusiasts http://farna.home.att.net/AMC.html (free download available!) _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list