A few details on this car are inconsistent... overall the car doesn't look molested, it appears to never have been in the hands of someone like me before, eg. someone who would fiddle with and interchange parts for dubious ends that would confuse future historians or restorers. But it's 44 years old, so who really knows? It's a 6309-5; hard top, twin stick, "powerpak", tall axle; yet the emblem on the trunk reads "440" no "H". That's minor though. -- Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Are you missing the big rear arm rests? It came with little tiny ones, that sure look correct and original. They fit properly and match the side panels, which are unique to the hardtop. They screwed into the sheet metal where the factory intended. > Does the bottom seat cushion have > a gap between the side and cushion also? Not exactly sure, see pics. > The large armrests came about 6" > out from the sides into the lower cushion with a mating "notch" in the > upper cushion. They are basically vinyl covered cardboard (same material > as original door panels, IIRC), so didn't always fair well. Should be an > ash tray in top of each one. All 440Hs got them. Mine definitely didn't have this, it's definitely a hard top, but maybe not a 440-H? Weird. I took a few pictures of the new stuff, not many of the old. I will photo the chassis interior before I bolt it all up. <http://wps.com/AMC/1963-Rambler-American/Interior-hardtop-rear/> The back cushion was > unique to the 440H (notches cut in frame of sedan cushion), the bottom > cushion was shared with the convertible. You tell me... ! > Sedan cushions fit and you won't > be able to get your arm through to the back then! I unintentionally exxagerated here, the gap isn't big enough to get my arm in, but I can insert my hand, it's definitely a design thing, and not "broken". Breezes noises and broomsticks easily pass through. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list