I'm not sure of your point. Of course there is energy loss. There will always be loss when you're converting energy from one form to another. You have the same issue with hydrogen or electric cars. The point is to get it into a form that is transportable. So with the air car you could take something like nuclear power (which is a little hard to fit in a car with the current technology) and use the electricity to pump up the air tank. Todd On Saturday 24 November 2007 22:22, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From what I have seen on other groups the air car is a energy loser. > I.E. It takes more energy to compress the air to drive the car then to > simply use the energy to drive the car without making the compressed air. > > > -- > Mark Price > Morgantown, WV > 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 > 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrc II > " Chronic Pain Hurts" > _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list