Re: [Amc-list] Early American Front Suspension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Early American Front Suspension
- From: "Thomas Garner" <Tgarner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:28:06 -0700
Found this on ebay and knew that you guys where talking about suspension stuff.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/RAMBLER-64-69-PROTHANE-SUSPENSION-KIT-TRUNION-AMC-BN_W0QQitemZ330163715450QQihZ014QQcategoryZ33583QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:28:53 -0700
From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] early american front suspension
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200709111228.54026.tomj@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 06:51:52 Frank Swygert wrote:
> Hmm... never thought about the braking forces much! I had 7.7" tires
> (195 mm) and 79 Spirit disc brakes at the time one of mine worked loose.
> One didn't feel quite as tight as the others in the arm, but didn't turn
> or anything. I did stake it at a visible spot with a punch so I could
> easily see if it was turning. After a few months I stopped looking much
> since it never moved. Checked it weekly for 2-3 months though! Two years
> later things changed somehow. It was a rear cap, so the braking forces
> make a bit of sense -- load is taken off the lower rear when braking
> hard, I'd think.
I think what might happen at the lower trunnion is that the tip of the A-arm
gets twisted during hard braking; the brakes try to rotate the steering
knuckle, on the drivers side it wants to go counter-clockwise. The knuckle is
a big lever with the fulcrum near the upper A-arm, and the load is the lower
rear trunnion cap -- it's pushed back and upward, transmitting energy to the
arms as twisting. (The trunnion pulls on the front trunnion cap.)
The shock spacer is the ONLY thing keeping the lower arm rigid! And I was
gonna make a reduced-diameter spacer to accomodate a modern shock, but I'm
not gonna do that any more -- in fact I think I will make a LARGER! diameter
spacer as a strength member, and put the shock more inwards (there's a pair
of extra holes in the lower arms about 3" further back). I'd rather have
poorer shock absorbtion/ride than busted trunnions!
_____________________________________________________________
Are you prepared for your exam
4TestsMail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://www.4testsmail.com/
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin