On Tuesday 31 July 2007 18:27:18 Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I knew that would peak your interest! Hell yeah! It looks like the weak point for long-term reliability with this motor could be solved. It's odd they bothered to add it to the last year's motors. It probably "fell out" of the 232 design/deploy phase; the aluminum 195.6 apparently shares valve train components with the 232 (you can probably drop 4.0 lifters in it!) _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list