The parts stores are largely wrong; AMC had 10" brakes on the V8's all along. Don't know how early (I just don't ahve the data) but definitely 62 up. I just mocked up 64 Ambassador 10" brakes on the 63 American. The sole problem is steering arm/tie rod clearance. With tall AMC spindles, a small notch in the backing plate edge (the dust seal) would clear it. The problem is that the drum's outside flange solidly hits the tie rod end. I now have one of every drum brake size AMC ever made (backing plate, drum, shoes, some wheel cyls). I took photos and measurements, and I'll be making a brake interchange page. Anyways I will talk to C H Topping (Long Beach CA) about this predicament. I bet they can either find me a drum, or tell me if cutting the outer dust seal lip is totally crazy or doable. To be honest, I'm probably going to bolt on the 9x2.5" brakes from Jim's Gremlin. That's a no-brainer and a lot more brake surface. That plus good quality shoes and drum drilling will be fine. But I'll persue the 10" thin because it's got the Cool Factor, besides being kick-ass good brakes for that little car. But I have other woes... On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 14:00 -0400, Jay wrote: > I have been interested in replacing the 9 x 2.5 inch drums on my 66 American > with some 10 inch drums. I went to Rockauto and every year Ambassador up > through 1969 has the 9 x 2.5 listed as standard brakes on the car. Heck, my > American has 9 x 2.5 inch brakes on the front as standard. What year did > AMC switch to 10 inch drums? I might do just as well putting a power brake > booster on my car and let it go like that. my brakes stop pretty well, they > just require a lot of leg pressure. Guess I am just too used to PB in all my > other cars. > > Jay in FL> > > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list