Re: [Amc-list] 304 2V fuel mileage
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] 304 2V fuel mileage
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
" From: "Jeff Reeves" <jeffr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"
"
"
"
" My 72 Javelin is still sporting its original 304 with a remanufactured
" []
" I also have one of the rare Sanden AC compressor brackets for the AMC V8
" so that I can mount a light and efficient Sanden AC compressor in lieu
" of the bulky York the car originally carried to save a bit more weight.
imho the weight difference will be scarcely noticeable. otoh the
power drain difference is tremendous, something like 5hp vs. 15.
" How about those Javelin owners who have six-cylinder engines? What sort
" of mileage would a 232 or 258 equipped Javelin get?
the 1bbl six might actually be worse than the v8. i remember when my
folks got their '66 bel air wagon i tried to talk them into a 283 v8
because it was good for 23 mpg, but they cheaped out and got the 230
which could only get 20.
more recently, 4-cyl cherokees get scarcely different mileage than
sixes, and i've heard that v6 grands get 3mpg less than 4.7 v8s.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin