" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:36 -0400, Sandwich Maker wrote: " " > just checked partsamerica - it showed ray 2501 rear at $45 and 2502 " > front at $65, but crossreferenced as fitting '59 americans and '68 " > ambassadors... they seem to have simply listed every amc from '59 to " > '72, including the ambo and amx which never had 9" brakes. " > " > i put '67 american 199 in, to find them. " > " > tried '76 gremlin 232 - they showed different parts. " " I fear this in my table-making. Besides plain old mistakes I might make, " which I can simply fix, the aftermarket blurs things. at least for our amcs, partsamerica seems to be particularly bad. they make you jump through all sorts of hoops to specify what year, make, model, and engine - and then they show you all the parts that fit every model and powertrain for many years, and you have to sort out which ones are actually relevant!!! i drove around inadvertently with the wrong rear cylinders for several years because of this. since i'd done a full brake job i didn't realize the problem until i replaced them with the right ones. " It's a really tough job to make the full brake list. What I'm doing is, yeah, no ####. " > tried '76 gremlin 232 - they showed different parts. " " This is probably due to aftermarket "collapsing" of part numbers. " Gremlins got 9x2 rears vs. 10x1.75 depending. Do you know which size was " listed for the above? all of them, including composite and full cast, double, single, and no finned 10". i also got two 9" front drums, bendix and raybestos. coverage ranged up to '73-'92, incl jeeps. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list