I would use the AMC 4cyl, late model multi port. Have you seen the intakes for them? They are a very basic "U" shape. It would be pretty easy to modify the intake. You could angle it up, or even pickup some aluminum tubing and make a custom as long as you left the injector bosses and a few inches of the intake to work from. Look over at ebay, there are usually intakes for sale that will show how basic they are in design. Just a big ole' U shaped chunk of aluminum, dry, no coolant, easy to work from. -- Mark Price Morgantown, WV 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM" <Francis.Swygert3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Sandwich Maker wrote: > > > " What about... a carb conversion of the 2.5L! Sicko! OK making > > " an intake manifold isn't trivial, but it would be a nice hack. > > " Old-style sort of with new-style parts availability. > > > > you mean like the early ones? '83 to iirc '86 were carbed, with a > > carter yf. next step after that was tbi for a year or two. > ------------------------- > > 83-84, IIRC. And as far as I recall, those intake manifolds stuck way > out on the side of the engine too. The real problem is the intake > doesn't have to stick out very far. There's only about four inches > between the 195.6 OHV intake and the spring tower at the closest point. > Anything with an EGR valve will hit it. That's probably why the 71-72 > Pinto 2.3L just did fit -- no EGR. With the age of the car you might get > away with pulling the EGR, but most states (especially CA and AZ!) will > check for the year of the engine. Emmission ratings go by the car body > or engine year, whichever is newer. > > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list