Re: [Amc-list] oops bent 'em again again
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] oops bent 'em again again
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
"
"
"
"
"
" I know it's common knowledge a modern AMC six won't fit, but
" since I had two cars side by side I did a quick check.
"
" To drop a 232 into a 63 American would require an additional
" 5 inches of length! With a "medium" water pump pulley, 3"
" or so, the front of the pulley would be out past the front of
" the radiator (which is forward of its brackets).
i've wondered if a ford 200/250 would fit. the 144/170/200 as late as
'66 or '67 were teamed with a tranny that looks a lot like [and i'm
pretty sure is] a t96 - little peanut 3sp, 4 bolt top cover... it
must be longer than the 196, but maybe not -too-much- longer. but
assuming you get this far, you couldn't use the australian/argentinian
12-port head; the head would fit but the intakes are very wide.
even if it fit, the 250 would require a tranny swap, because it has a
different bellhousing pattern than the 200 and was never teamed with
anything remotely like the t96.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin