" From: "Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM" <Francis.Swygert3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> " " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Sandwich Maker wrote: " " > " The power steering slave units are jet-aircraft complex (check " > " out the TSM procedures! Makes the auto-trans look like a carb " > " rebuild), but are very reliable, they often just end up leaking. " > " > and it should be easy to retrofit saginaw integral ps - didn't the '65 " > or '66 have it? the ps gear would mount with a sill plate adapter " > anyways, and probably take the existing pitman arm. " " [] " " I know that in later years there's only like two pitman arms. I " wouldn't be surprised if they fit the old box too. The major " differences are power vs. manual (different splined-end diameter) " and big vs. small taper on the outside end (old cars use large " taper ball joints/rod ends, otherwise interchangable!). Not " sure if there's any pitman arm length differences but that's " trivial to check. " --------------------------------- " " I've made the change. I used a 1980 Concord PS box (same Saginaw as 70s " AMC). The only big difference is the pitman arm stud that connects to " the drag link -- the taper and size is different from early 60s AMCs. another good possibility occurs to me - the saginaw 605 vega ps box. this is smaller than the regular sag 750 and has a -manual- box bolt pattern and iirc pitman arm taper. sounds to me like it was designed to be a direct swap for manual gear... it's very popular in the old chevies etc crowds, to the point you can get new 'built' gears. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list