Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators

["Armand Eshleman" <aje1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks John,
I guess you just answered my question about the group order. Now I'm
wondering what they would charge me to make one with a wider u channel
rotated 180 degrees and that has the flanges running past the radiator tubes
like I sent a link
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=BCI%2D60100&N=700+300241+115&autoview=sku
picture of a while back. click on the enlarge tab. I suppose though it would
change the entire design too much.
I really can't imagine it would be that much more difficult to weld,
actually it would be easier because the flanges or legs of the channel are
not in the way?? Any way let me know.
I really appreciate it,
Armand

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <JWidiker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans.'" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators


> Armand, I thought you had gotten a reply, sorry if you hadn't, I'll be
sure
> to discuss it with them.
>
> The ribs can be cut off (by the purchaser) if you like, it's possible to
do
> and MAY not compromise the rad. The warranty is gone once it's cut
however.
> The ribs you are referring to is a U channel and it is somewhat
structural,
> there isn't a good way to weld that piece if it's upside down and the
> decision was made not to change the design for one order.
>
> The group buy doesn't end until the 31st and deliveries are scheduled for
10
> days from then, the details are on the site.
>
> ~John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Armand Eshleman
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:23 PM
> To: AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans.
> Subject: Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators
>
> Just wondering here, are all you guys that bought these radiators happy
with
> the way they look??
> I've been trying to get an answer from Matt about rotating the flanged top
> and bottom cap, even
> for just one radiator. For some reason they are not making a decision if
> they would do that or not.
> John can you influence those guys a bit just to give me an answer?? Maybe
> give me their phone
> number or give them mine if need be. I would just like an answer, it's
been
> at least ten days since I asked !
> thanks,
> Armand
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Widiker, John D" <john.widiker@xxxxxxx>
> To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators
>
>
> > Bulk buy ends on the 31st, if you look at the site all the info is
> > there.
> >
> >
> > ~John
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:08 PM
> > To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Jgray_55@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators
> >
> > HI. I need to look back thru my emails...BUT. Anyone know if the
> > radiators have shipped yet?? I ordered one for my V8(401) Gremlin.I paid
> > awhile back before production of them. I have TONS of emails to go thru
> > to locate the exact one i need. Thanks alot,Joe
> > --- amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Send Amc-list mailing list submissions to
> > > amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > amc-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of Amc-list digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > >    1. Re: Sins (Archimedes)
> > >    2. Re: Sins (Archimedes)
> > >    3. Re: Trademarks (Archimedes)
> > >    4. fwd performance some more (Andrew Blomer)
> > >    5. Re: Sins (JOE FULTON)
> > >    6. Re: Sins (JOE FULTON)
> > >    7. Re: Sins (Sandwich Maker)
> > >    8. Re: Sins (Sandwich Maker)
> > >    9. Trademarks (Don Johnson)
> > >   10. How bad do cars rust in South Dakota? (Brian
> > > Seeley)
> > >   11. Re: How bad do cars rust in South Dakota?
> > >       (Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> > >   12. Re: How bad do cars rust in South Dakota?
> > > (Widiker, John D)
> > >   13. Thanks... (Keleigh Hardie)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:31:24 -0400
> > > From: Archimedes <Freedom@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Sins
> > > To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Message-ID:
> > > <5.1.0.14.1.20070323090035.01f34258@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> > >
> > >
> > > John Mahoney postulates:
> > >
> > >
> > > >NUMMI, NAFTA, and NASA are not to blame: our
> > > schools, our teachers, our
> > > >kids, -ourselves- are.  Life got too easy, we got
> > > too confident; we got
> > > >too comfortable being the Americans that everyone
> > > else wanted to be
> > > >too.  Everyone else worked toward where we were,
> > > and then kept right on
> > > >going.  That's why GM and Ford and Chrysler and
> > > American Motors can't get
> > > >ahead.  Or why one of them --- two of them? ---
> > > three of them? --- now are
> > > >dead.
> > >
> > >
> > > They're all either dead or on life support because Americans don't
> > > seem to understand that we're not ina  battle for whatever riches we
> > > can win today, and to heck with tomorrow -- we're in a battle to be
> > > economically alive tomorrow.
> > >
> > > When Executives, Managers, and line workers start to understand that
> > > multimillion dollar salaries and $50 per hour wages and cushy
> > > pensions-for-life for assembly line work were an anomaly and cannot be
> >
> > > supported indefinitely, maybe attitudes will change.
> > >  But I doubt it.  It
> > > seems like the entire culture is unwilling to get off the "give me
> > > every dime I want, or the factory can "Go To ....".
> > >
> > > Why would $50 per hour workers rather see their factory close, than
> > > accept
> > > $25 per hour?  Why would executives want to see their livilihoods
> > > become the plaything of Chinese state bureaucrats?
> > >
> > > If there is less demand for your product, YOU HAVE TO REDUCE THE PRICE
> >
> > > until demand matches your supply.  Right now, there is less and less
> > > demand for American labor because its price is way too high, at every
> > > level -- worker, middle, and executive.
> > >
> > > I keep seeing these sites with photos of all the dead factories in the
> >
> > > industrial belt.  I earn a lot less than auto workers do.  I would
> > > enjoy factory work for my current pay (did it before).
> > > Why am I prevented from
> > > selling my work to an auto factory for my current rate if I so choose?
> > >
> > >
> > > >Speaking of assembled cars, try this:  Did
> > > Studebaker or AMC build any?
> > >
> > >
> > > Sure, the AMGeneral Metro Bus:
> > >
> > >          http://www.omot.org/roster/buses/amg.html
> > >
> > > In all seriousness, AMC did build the last of the Diplomat/LeBaron
> > > line.  Does that qualify?
> > >
> > > In addition, a lot of the later frankish metal was mostly assembled
> > > from parts made in France or otherwise sourced from Renault.  The
> > > Premier engines, for example, were Puegeot(sp?)-Renault-Volvo...  The
> > > Healey was made in Britain so that doesn't qualify...  And so was the
> > > Met.
> > >
> > > Or do you mean a stand-alone line of cars that they built under their
> > > own brand name, but built entirely from off-the-shelf parts from
> > > outside manufacturers?  If that's what you mean, I don't have a clue.
> > >
> > > Did I get the no-prize?
> > >
> > > -- Marc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 2
> > > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:39:18 -0400
> > > From: Archimedes <Freedom@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Sins
> > > To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Message-ID:
> > > <5.1.0.14.1.20070323093608.01f0ca70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> > >
> > >
> > > >"Look what a 2007
> > > >" American luxury station wagon has become.
> > > Overpriced, oversized,
> > > >" overweight, or overdone?"  That SportCombi was
> > > almost as new, with a
> > > >" hunkered-down style and a matte trim my old Sport
> > > had had, but it
> > > >" still looked so much like an Eagle that I sighed.
> > >  "Look what a 2007
> > > >" car can be when it's not American.  Shapely,
> > > stylish, refined,
> > > >" powerful, and economical."
> > > >"
> > > >" And it's built by GM.  Not in America.  How come
> > > that can happen?  Huh?
> > > >
> > > >it's built by gm only technically, because they
> > > bought the company.
> > > >saab was building sylish, refined, etc cars
> > >
> > >
> > > And unreliable...
> > >
> > >
> > > >long before the general
> > > >showed up with his wallet - and they were for sale
> > > because their
> > > >profit margin was vanishing.  supposedly gm still
> > > loses money on
> > > >saabs.
> > >
> > >
> > > Because they are unreliable, *and* because all employees (workers and
> > > management) in the division are grossly overpaid.
> > >
> > > GM motors would have done wonders in those crates, at least as far as
> > > reliablity is concerned.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ____________
> > Never miss an email again!
> > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amc-list mailing list
> > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amc-list mailing list
> > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/730 - Release Date: 3/22/07
> 7:44 AM
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/733 - Release Date: 3/25/07
11:07 AM
>
>

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list