They give first 1967 sales figures (first year of Camaro sales) to show that it probably did begin to cut into Mustang sales. They mention the Barracuda figures for 1967 too, and then there was the poor AMC Marlin with only about 4500 sold. No wonder people were laughing at AMC and isn't it amazing how the AMX and Javelin changed some peoples minds about the company ........but not the editors at PHR evidently. -------------- Most magazines are businesses too, and they can't sell enough to the AMC crowd -- there just aren't enough of us. If I printed an AMC magazine based on performance cars only, I'd sell a lot more. But I'm not interested in total sales, I'm more interested in preserving and spreading information on all AMCs, not just performance, trying to cover every model. In fact, the ones that are less likely to get covered elsewhere are the ones I'm most interested in giving some coverage. The underdogs underdogs... but I do cover performance, I try to cover everything equally in AMC Magazine. It's a tough job! Concerning the article about 67 models though... AMC attempted to market the Marlin as a sporty car in the same league as the Mustang and Camaro. We can all see now that it just couldn't compete, but in 65 when it came out who could tell if a larger version would do well or not? By 67 I think they knew, but AMC had started the marketing. The Rogue would have been a better comparison to the Mustang/Camaro in 67, but then it was more like the Falcon Sprint and Chevy II V-8. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list