Hi Keleigh, $400.00 sounds like a good deal to me. I also have another factor to help me decide one way or the other when it comes to engine swaps and other major work... no garage or carport! This is why I haven't installed the Howell yet. Russ -----Original Message----- >From: Keleigh Hardie <keleigh3000@xxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Mar 9, 2007 8:47 AM >To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Looking for parts & advice. > >I have a 4.0 in my Eagle, originally because I got it cheap, only 400 >clams for the engine, complete with all EFI parts and harnesses. It has >about 50% more power than the stock 258, better mileage and >driveability, and is less troublesome (less maintenance and oil leaks). >The 258 has better low end torque, the 4.0 revs better, you pays your >money and you takes your choice. Overall, I agree with Andrew, a good >258 w/ the EFI kit will give you most of what a 4.0 upgrade would cost, >but cheaper and without the hassle of an engine swap. If you really want >more power, you might consider just the 4.0 head. Or if you really want >more power, put your 258 crank in a 4.0 block for a 4.9. I hear strokers >rock! > >Keleigh > >Sandwich Maker wrote: >> " From: Russell Neyhart <rtneyhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> " >> " >> " Is the 4.0 liter really that much "better" than the 258? Would anyone >> " in "normal" driving even notice? For instance, I have a Howell EFI >> " setup (not installed yet) so someday the BBD setup will be a nice >> " conversation piece in my workshop, with the EFI setup would there be >> " much if any real difference between the two engines, performance or >> " economy wise? I have a relatively low mileage engine for the year and >> " don't see any reason why I'd want to swap it for a 4.0 for regular duty >> " just putting around town and going to shows. If there is a thread that >> " has discussed this already... please point the way! >> >> dunno about the howell, but the 258 with the mopar efi kit was rated >> 160-170 hp. that makes the jump to 4.0 power a lot smaller and the >> 4.0's cam doesn't have the low-rpm power the 258's does. >> >> if you needed a new engine the 4.0 would be a reasonable choice, but i >> don't think it'd be worth scrapping what you already have. >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> Andrew Hay the genius nature >> internet rambler is to see what all have seen >> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought >> _______________________________________________ >> Amc-list mailing list >> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Amc-list mailing list >Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list