Yeah that is weird.........but then again ford has been offering up parts for AMCs as production pieces ...example starters....so what the heck. I know when I swapped a 92 Mustang T-5 into my 70 Javelin (a bolt it swap) the $10 Mustang driveshaft was too short........and the original AMC shaft didn't fit at all.............so I had a shop fab a new shaft using the ends of the donor Mustang shaft, cost $100, .......came back from the shop....noticed the balancing weights were in the same location on the new shaft......installed the shaft......drove the car.......no problems.......I should mention the shop included new u joints too.......front joint is larger than the AMC joint now as I used a Mustang output yoke too.........rear u joint is an adaptive one fit both AMC model 20 yoke and Mustang driveshaft ...... heavier duty too.......shaft is larger diameter just like Mark was saying........ Armand If you have a 72 up AMC 232-242-258 six with a T-5 transmission and an AMC15 rear axle in an American sedan, yes, a 77 Pinto wagon driveshaft is a bolt in! That's weird! Pintos are far rarer around here (Los Angeles) than Gremlins! Good hack though! How did you figure that out? > I'm using a true 82 Spirit T-5, it's overall length is the > same as a Ford T-5. So barring unforeseen differences car-car > this "should" be a bolt in to all American bodies that share the > two door sedan wheel base. I'm not sure what the AMC-20 rear axle > would do. If it's pinion is longer or farther forward I do not > think it will work as it is a "tight" fit in my combination. The amc20 needs a shorter driveshaft, the U-joint is more forward by about 1 - 2" (by memory). _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list