Re: [Amc-list] Radiators
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Radiators
- From: Mark Price <markprice242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:25:19 -0800
No real reason other than the reduced height would allow less expansion room at the top of the rad. requiring a recovery system to allow for expansion and contraction. Drag rules call for a catch can, but I would think the low tank rad would need a true recovery system.
--
Mark Price
markprice242ATadelphia.net
Morgantown, WV
---- Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> " From: Mark Price <markprice242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> "
> " Then add a low tank option to cover even more!
>
> why not make just the low tank rad? any reason it would not fit the
> other apps?
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay the genius nature
> internet rambler is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin