Marc, it's been a while since you saw one of these hasn't it? They have a narrow engine bay as well as short. While I agree that a four will be much better than a V-8, it's a little more than half the work. Still have to fab engine and trans mounts, but only have to cut the left side hump down. The intake on a four sticks out to far from the engine to clear without doing this. The early 2.3L Ford engines (early 70s Pinto) had a relatively close to the head intake, and it would just barely clear. I helped swap one of those in a 54 Nash Rambler (same under the hood as the 58-63 American). Newer models stick out further. In 94-95 I looked into installing a GM 2.5L or a Mitsubishi 2.6L. Neither would fit without cutting -- needed the extra 2-3" of clearance. _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com