" From: "M Walter" <redamc1963@xxxxxxxxxxx> " " Hello AMC people! Here I am again asking advise on yet another idea on a " powertrain swap for my beloved little red 'vert. The thought of cutting up " the engine bay on this car to put in a 290 really makes me cringe. " Especially after seeing a couple examples on ebay. So my thoghts are now " leaning toward a 258 or a 232, because it has to be an AMC. I have so far " kept the car period correct, but not totally origional. The car is just to " nice to be sporting the 196 ohv. There is no aftermarket for it and not " much potential. I already have a T14 to hook it up to. Also is there any " difference in bell pattern up to '85or '86? THANK YOU once again, there is a major shift in bell pattern '71-2. '64-'71 199/232/258 have the same small pattern as the 196; '72-up 232/258/4.0 have the larger 290-later v8 pattern. the later six is quite a lot longer than your 196; it could take just as much cutting though of a different sort to fit as a v8 would take. a non-amc possibility would be a ford 200. iirc they used the t96 up to '65 or so, so with the right bellhousing it'd bolt up to your t14. [phase 2: there are also sr4/t4/t5 pattern bells for the 170/200] there are a number of speed parts for it but imho the best is the australian/argentinian 12-port head and 2bbl intake. someone's bringing them into this country... late 200s, like the 250, have the ford small-v8 pattern. there is no t96-pattern bells for these. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com