Jim Snip I'm slowly, as money allows, putting together the parts for a "hot" engine. I've been looking at the Edelbrock heads, but am confused as to which version is appropriate. They come with or without the heat crossover. I have a choice of intakes gathered already: R4B, Torker, Offy 2x4 Anyway, what do ya think? Jim Boone Snip As long as you have asked for opinions here is mine. Jock is probably the most qualified person to answer this question with his extensive back ground and experience. However, My choice for the intake manifold is the Edelbrock Air Gap manifold, I have run one a few years now and I am completely satisfied with it. Having stated that, the air gap manifold does not have any exhaust cross over provisions the head choice is automatic. The one with out the cross over passages. While I agree carburetor icing can be a problem when you least expect it, the last time I had that problem was on a 1960 Ford I-6 pick up in the middle 70's when I lived near Rochester N.Y. and then it was only one winter. It looked really funny to see the accelerator linkage enter a snow ball under the air cleaner. For more than a few years now I live where the temperature gets into triple digits along about March and drops out some time in October. It very rarely gets below 50 here during the winter. I do not have a problem with engine warming up, drivability or anything else related to cold weather driving. Also the carburetor does not get excessively warm and lean out like it did with a non-air gap or stock cast iron manifold. Carburetor tuning on using the Edelbrock air gap manifold is no different that tuning on a stock manifold. I am using the parts on a 1970 390 cu in engine in a Mark Donohue. In any case that is my experience and preference. Pays your moneys and takes your chances, but have fun. John. _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com