On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM wrote: > It looks and sounds more complicated than it is. Poor vacuum and oil > pressure would kill it before a bad switch. At least from what I > remember (will have to look over a TSM again!) a bad switch should be > obvious -- like grinding going into a gear or something. For > deceleration the servo compared engine vacuum with oil pressure. The > amazing thing is the engineers managed to make it all work without a > speed or motion sensor, they extrapolated that MECHANICALLY with vacuum, > oil pressure, and shift lever position information only!! Smart guys... Oh yeah, it's not a stupid system. It's pretty damn clever, failsafe, etc. The only real shortcoming is one common to older lower-cost systems: one thing performing two functions that has "side effects". Oil pressure is a signal (engine speed) and hydraulic power for the clutch; the latter makes is sensitive to worn motors. If it simply controlled the energy from some other source eg. remained only a signal, it would have worked better, but cost a lot more, eg. add an electric motor servo to slave the clutch to it. At least, the way it dies is de-clutched, which is better death-on-the-side-of-the-road than clutch always engaged. _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com