On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Nick ALFANO wrote: > I would tend to go along with you that they didn't > really exist except I inspected it yesterday. It does > have the 401 cast into the side of the block, there > definitely is an "X" stamped above the casting and it > is a 3.750 bore. The water jackets are much larger > than a normal AMC V8. Looking at the size of them, I > doubt this engine could be bored more than .060 over > the 3.750 bore. The oil return holes in the intake > valley are plugged and it had 4 bolt mains at some > point in it's life. The part number shows it is a 401 > but the bore is definitely not. There is also "401" > cast into the valley section of the block. This is > not some homemade job. It is definitely cast into the > block. The casting marks are much more pronounced on > this block than normal. The block has been tanked and > blasted down to a bare casting so there is no hiding > what is there. From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Wow, that's pretty spectacular. Where did you get it? Where did it come from? Where there heads that came with it? <> with the lifter valley returns plugged - she sported a dry sump with a scavenging system at one time. biggest valve would be a 1.9 ? - based on a 304 head / bore size. does the owners have any trackable background on the block ? would make a great TURBO motor - what do the current owners have in mind ? [ one nutt or two, left hand, right arm, first newborn ? ] =Bt= milnersXcoupe "The Heretic" _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com