Re: [AMC-List] AMC vs Ford engine weight.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-List] AMC vs Ford engine weight.
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:18:26 -0500 (EST)
" From: "John Elle" <johnelle@xxxxxxxxx>
"
"
"
"
"
"
" The internet has the really amazing capabilities called
" search engines. I have noticed that they weigh far less
" than an AMC V8, but if you use one it will come up
" with the following URL.
"
" http://www.241computers.com/ford/ContentExpress20-30-38.html
"
" If you read the table at that site it lists the AMC v8
" at 540 lbs and the Ford 302 at 450/460 lbs. Which
" sounds about right.
" At about ½ the weight of an AMC is--------the winna!
" 1098cc 253 Midget/Sprite
" Which would probably fit nice in an early Rambler
" and improve the handling too!
" And surprise, it was used in an early Rambler, the
" Metropolitan.
close but... the met was sort-of a rambler, being made by austin [later
to become british leyland] for nash. also, the engine it used was the
bl b-series, not the 948/1098/1275cc a-series. i think it started at
~1200 but grew to ~1500 in the met and ~1800 in a revised 5-main
version in the mgb. i believe the ~300cc c-series 6 is a b-and-a-half.
i also note they say a 199 weighs 500 lbs. recalling the pr flack
that they shaved 90lbs from the 258 in '81, that would make it about
410... i believe the 4.0 falls somewhere in between.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
or go to http://www.amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin