On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Sandwich Maker wrote: > all good things to know! but one additional point - the non-od t14 is > ~2" shorter than the t96 or [i believe] the od setups. but there must > be plenty of '67-9 american owners out there [199s mostly, early 232s] > who'd love to trade their t96 setup for a non-od t14, and their > driveshaft would be the right length for your new od setup. Really? I have a non-OD T14 that was behind a 1969 232 (Thanks Joe!) that I ended up not needing -- will let it got for a pittance. I took the cover off to look inside, since it had non-factory gasket cement -- looks spotless, possibly rebuilt. Synchros looked new. Here in Los Angeles. The T96's do suck. Frank knows a lot more than me, but I can tell you I broke one (sheared teeth off first gear!) using a dead-stock 232 as the hammer. _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com