Re: [AMC-List] performance cam for 196 ohv

["Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM" <Francis.Swygert3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think I looked into this and found that the lobe centers are
different? Can't recall now. Might be just that it wasn't necessary for
the added lift. As I said, there's plenty adjustment in the rockers to
make up 0.10" added lift, no longer pushrods necessary. You guys are to
used to the new stuff with no adjustment!! ;> 

-----original messages-----------

Yeah, exactly my thought!
especially if the base circle is the same or larger.
If it was larger you could get one regorund and not need to do the
pushrod
thing!
Just have them leave the base circle at the stock overhead cam spec!
--
Mark Price
markprice242ATadelphia.net
Morgantown, WV


---- Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM wrote:
>
> > The cam is definitely different from a flat head cam. The bearings
are
> > the same, so the cam would fit, but the lobe profiles are totally
> > different.
>
> Then they might make good cores!

_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

or go to http://www.amc-list.com