The only difference for the front suspension is the shock towers. The Mustang II type suspensions require a lot of cutting and welding due to the way the upper arm is mounted. I've seen it done, but it's a lot of work to do right. If you have access to a 70+ Javelin, AMX, or even Hornet (or derivative) you may as well cut the spring tower out. The Hornet type won't be an exact fit for the AMX, but the suspension mount locations are correct.Cut and trim the Hornet panel then cut out what is necessary on the Javelin. The upper part of the panel is the main difference. If welded properly it will be as strong as a one piece panel, but a little reinforcement along the weld seams (say a 2" strip of metal welded in behind the seams, and along the edges) won't hurt. Just don't get it to hot while welding -- that's the primary mistake people make. You may know this already, but weld in 1/2" beads then skip and inch and weld another 1/2". When complete allow the metal to cool a bit (30 minutes is nice!), then start again. Takes three rotations, but the metal has the needed time to cool between welds. Electric arc welding ("stick", TIG, MIG, or flux core) brings temps up to over 1200 degrees at the weld, which sinks into the surrounding metal quickly. A continuous bead is faster and looks better, but overheats the metal and changes the composition in the weld area, making it brittle. NEVER rush welding!! But I have to ask why you want to change the suspension. You get some built in anti-dive with the newer suspension, but that's the only real benefit. Upper trunnions are expensive to replace, but the replacements with poly bushings will last the life of the car with little maintenance, unlike the original ones made with a softer, older synthetic rubber compound. Or replace all the rubber with machined bronze bushings (any machinist can make and install if you take them the trunnion, upright, and trhough bolt). I've not noticed a lot of dive on hard braking except on bone stock cars. Stiffer springs and sway bars usually minimize dive on hard braking. Replacing the trunnions with a poly or bronze bushed type will cost less and be less work than any of the other two options. Even if you have a donor car sitting there and can do all the cutting and welding yourself, there is a lot more work involved for little gain. I understand not wanting to mess with the trunnions again, but if done right with modern parts there will be no need to. Most people want to replace the trunnions because they think they're a poor design. That's not the case. Even the original rubber design lasts as long as ball joints, mileage and time combined. The rubber does degrade with time even if the car had only a couple thousand miles on it when parked, so a 36 year old low mile trunnion will need replacing if driven whereas a ball joint would just need some fresh grease. That's rarely the case -- most older cars have been driven and the ball joints are due to be replaced in 20-30 years. The original criteria design for most cars in the 60s was 10 years or 100,000 miles before worn to replacement for "hard" parts (not belts, tires, etc.). The rubber bushed trunnions exceed that, but the poly or bronze bushed ones will go twice that amount easily, and won't degrade like even modern synthetic rubber formulas eventually will. Poly will eventually degrade, but not after 10 years unless they have come into contact with some type of incompatible lube. Modern synthetic grease shouldn't affect them. The trunnion is not an inferior design, just a different one. The auto world went to ball joints because they were eventually cheaper and most importantly quicker to install. There are more parts to a trunnion suspension and it takes more time to assemble it, but that shouldn't matter now, since it's just one car and only needs to be done once. _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com