Re: [AMC-List] 401 crank wanted & IH question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-List] 401 crank wanted & IH question
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
"
"
" You're right about the 304. I wonder why they put those heavy things in
" Scouts instead of the much lighter AMC engines. They used the 258 and
" their own four cylinder (which was half the small V-8), then used the
" heavy V-8 instead of a lighter one! Maybe AMC didn't feel they had the
" capacity to provide 304s or 360s (hmmm... a 360 Scout!!), but needed
" the added sales to keep the volume of 401s up. I don't think the Scout
" competed with Jeeps that much -- it was more or less between a CJ and
" FSJ.
i've heard that the little ih trucks were always loss leaders, meant
to grease the sales of the big rigs. in line with that, the 345 [for
example] is the same mill used in 2t and 5t trucks, complete with
nitrided crank and forged rods. [i was told in the early '80s that a
new 345 cost $4500!] this sort of overbuilding is why their scouts
and pickups got such a rep for toughness.
in only started using amc sixes after they stopped using their own
mid-200s-cube mill, perhaps for emissions reasons. this was about '68.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
or go to http://www.amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin