-------------- Original message -------------- From: msproviero@xxxxxxxxxxx > Disclaimer: I am not trying to be a jerk with this reply. > > You are completely thinking in the wrong decade. It has a D27 front and what > looks like a D53 rear and its really not suitable for wheeling, as the entire > drivetrain would have to be replaced for me to have any confidence in it doing > anything off the pavement and returning home under its own power. I'd rather > break newer, common parts than the older unobtanium. I wouldn't feel comfotable > wheeling a heavy rig like that on D44's, even. > > I don't know what "35's" you're referring to. Dana 35's? FSJ's never used > D35's. They used a D30 front from 71-73. > > -Spro > Spro,4x4's i have limited knolage of compared to 2wd cars.and yes i meant Dana 35's .i thought the early FSJ's used em i stand corected knwoing that they used Dana'30's and if your uncomfortable with the 44's i mentioned ok how bout a 3/4 ton running gear Dana 60 front and rear with the flipped shackles and a Dana 300 or NP 205 transfer case?Also while I agree about using a more reliable engine/trans combo whats so bad about the AMC 327? i thought in 4v form they were tough motors.I see traditional hot rodders revamping flatties and Ford guys running tried and true Y block V8's myself included with my 60 Effie. Bart _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com