ADEQUATELY is the key phrase here! The 196 in a 63-64 Classic wagon is about like the 87 Pontiac 6000 I had with the 2.5L four (or Chevy Celebrity, etc.). Fine around town, a little stressed on long trips, especially if loaded. Just don't get in a hurry and take it easy and it's fine. The 199 is actually a lot better -- the 196 turns a lot slower and takes noticeably longer to build up speed/power. ---- original message ------------------------ " From: Tom Jennings <tomj at wps.com " On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Ken Ames wrote: " > Other trannys of the same model don't need this. " > Must be an internal leakdown of some sort. " > I've heard that prolonged idling in park isn't good for the Chryco " > transmissions, better to do it in neutral as there is better oilflow and the " > above seems to bear that out. " " I wouldn't be surprised. I've had really good luck with this " trans, even though it's small, air-cooled, and in a largeish car " (Classic wagon). otoh it can't be -that- 'largeish' if a 199 will motivate it adequately, automatic and all! Andrew Hay _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com