Re: Ethanol?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ethanol?
- From: " Russell T. Neyhart" <rtneyhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:52:36 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
The instrument pictured here is a set up to do 10's of thousands of yeast culture tests to utilize the rest of the corn now not usable for fuel. The company I work for produced the left component until a short while ago. While servicing this instrument I got to speak with a gentleman from the USDA who is in charge of this project. http://www.hudsoncontrol.com/Ethanol_for_Fuel.htm
AMC content... the wheel spacers for my Eagle are on the way. I should be able to install them next weekend.
Regards,
Russ from Pa.
88 Eagle $2185
-----Original Message-----
>From: Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Mar 22, 2006 11:20 AM
>To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Ethanol?
>
>" From: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>"
>" Holy crap batman. More hype? Or the truth?
>" I was considering running the Ambassador on E 85 or 100.
>" Now I'm wondering if it is worth the effort?
>"
>" http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1225
>
>he seems to be a 'watcher', very good at seeing where we've been but
>not so good at where we could go. but --
>
>i have long thought that our ethanol program was contrived to make
>archer-daniels-midland richer, and little else. our whole
>infrastructure is based on making fda-grade output; cost structure has
>a completely different set of imperatives. to then burn this as fuel
>would be funny, if people weren't so serious.
>
>there are two ways to link sugars into long chain polymers, starch and
>cellulose. we - and yeast - can only break starch down. but so much
>more of the plant is cellulose - why waste it, if you're seeking fuel?
>basing our fuel ethanol on corn starch is an example of food-think.
>
>the solution: cellulosic ethanol. it isn't here yet, but it's coming.
>but why only ethanol? perhaps propanol or butanol or some other
>liquid fermentation product would make a better fuel. it doesn't have
>to be drinkable!
>
>there is one point for ethenol: it is -possible- to 'dehydrate' it
>into ethylene, chemical feedstock #1 in the plastics industry.
>
>i'm not finished, but that's enough rant for today...
>________________________________________________________________________
>Andrew Hay the genius nature
>internet rambler is to see what all have seen
>adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
>
>
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin