Re: Fwd: Pacer Suspension:
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Pacer Suspension:
- From: farna@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:00:29 -0500
Andrew, could you scan and send me the page with the flange thicknesses, or make up a chart of years and thickness, disc or drum brakes? Sounds like I got it backwards, but I got the info from someone else who mentioned that the DISC spindle had the thicker flange for the caliper offset. Doesn't sound right, as the caliper adapter is 3/8" thick itself. Disc spindle flange would seemingly need to be thinner to keep tread from increasing to much.
On December 29, 2005 andrew hay wrote:
> napa says #12/#13 for mustangs including II, pinto, and most other
> falcon-derived fords. sounds like these use the same race - inner or
> outer - as the amc's #2/#6, if they fit.
>
> " I have a set of 1963 drums that I'm removing the hubs from. Note that
> " drum hubs will fit on disc spindles and rotors on drum spindles, but the
>
> true of all but the big bendix spindles, which use different bearings,
> afaik.
>
> " mounting surface (where the four holes to bolt the spindle on are) is a
> " bit thicker on disc spindles to space the rotor out for the caliper. I
> " have verified fit of a 1980 concord rotor on a 63 drum spindle, and vice
> " versa.
>
> the mitchell master interchange listed several flange thicknesses
> starting in the early '70s, with the drum spindle generally the
> thicker to match the caliper adapter behind disk spindles.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay
=============================================================
Posted by wixList Archiver -- http://www.amxfiles.com/wixlist
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin