Re: found some old iron and my new 59 willys
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: found some old iron and my new 59 willys
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
" From: farna@xxxxxxx
"
" The overall length of a 199-4.0 might be a problem. It's got a 3.32"
" bore (compared to 3.75" on the 199-4.0), so length will be close. The
" 195.6 had a 3.125" bore w/short water pump in the 58-63 American, and
" a 199-4.0L won't fit those cars without major firewall surgery. There's
" still 3" to make up in bore alone between the 226 and a 199-4.0, so I
" doubt the longer engine would fit the short looking Jeep hood.
yeah, but the 226 is heavy old-tech casting and probably has generous
bore spacing. remember, when the sbc came out in '55 with a 3.75"
bore, the engineers were sure they'd gotten everything possible out of
the block. and it was light compared to previous engines.
i still think an ohv connie 245 would be the cool engine swap.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin