Re: P-N-D-L in 67 232 American

["Mark Price" <mprice@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It should be an ideal candidate for your 65.
There won't be much difference at all.
It wouldn't matter if it turned out to be a PRND21 trans as it will still work. You just loose the rear pump and maybe the kickdown cable. I don't know what year they went to vacuum control. Both my 68 trans had vacuum without a cable. IIRC.
Mark Price
mpriceATwestco.net
Morgantown, WV
69 AMC rambler, 4.0L, EFI, 5 speed 
65 Ambassador Conv, 327 AUTO, Basketcase
01 S-10 CREWCRAP 4X4



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Mike Kindle" <mike90066@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mail-From-mprice-westco.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:27:23 -0700

>I was talking to a guy who pulled a 232 AT combo out of a 67 American to do 
>a V8 swap and he said it's a 2-speed automatic because of the P-N-D-L shift 
>pattern.  (I guess he meant PRNDL) I said are you sure it's not 
>P-R-N-D2-D1-L like in my 65? And he said no, just D-L.
>What is in this car?
>How can one tell for sure?
>I was thinking this tranny could replace the dying one in my 232- 65 but now 
>I'm not sure.
>Thanks,
>Mike Kindle
>
>
>
>
>
>
>