Re: Numbers, any one?

[Gwendolyn Ann Smith <gwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>, you said...

>> block 3190808 - 390 CI YEAR 1968-1969 BORE 4.165
>
>I trust Gwen made no typos; does anyone have any ideas on why this
>3.595" bored six block would have a V8 part number?

I didn't make a typo, but I did look back a second time at the 
information I copied/pasted the above from -- and I found a different use 
of that same number.

block 3190808 - 232 CI YEAR 1964-1970 3.8 LITRE, BORE 3.7500 STROKE 3.5000

Of course, it makes no sense to me that there would be a re-use of a 
number like this: my suspicion is that the source I had for the first 
number (which listed 3190808 as a V-8) was in error.

Cheers,
Gwen Smith

 ______^_____^______
(O|O) =RAMBLER= (O|O) Gwen Smith * gwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 -------------------  www.gwensmith.com/interests/rambler
 \-<>---|770|---<>-/