Re: DID ANYONE ON THE LIST IN THE BAY AREA LOOK AT THIS CAR?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DID ANYONE ON THE LIST IN THE BAY AREA LOOK AT THIS CAR?
- From: "Jim Blair" <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:30:55 -0700
A: The first XJs came out with a carbed 2.5L and 3.55 or 3.73 ratio with
4.10 in the '86 up Comanche and XJ with tow package. The 2.8L often had 3.07
or 3.55 and so did the 4 cyl with 904 auto.
From: farna@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: DID ANYONE ON THE LIST IN THE BAY AREA LOOK AT THIS CAR?
To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <ADVANCES62UijbeYgNO00002f0c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A better/easier idea for a driver using that American would be a Jeep 2.5L
four and five speed. They used a 4.11 rear gear though. A 1980 Spirit
2.5L/4spd combo used a 3.08 axle, but I doubt that would give good
performance. The American should perform just a bit better than a
Cherokee -- my 63 Classic is about the equivalent in weight and frontal area
nad performs about like a Cherokee does. So you should be able to get great
performance with a 4.11 axle, and should be able to use a 3.73 or something
similar and still get good performance and a bit better mileage. The
American might work with a 3.08, but I'd go lower. To high a ratio will have
negative results on mileage and performance.
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin