Re: 1974 - 232
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1974 - 232
- From: Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:36:34 -0400
<snip>
2. Shaft (1964-71 and mid 73-74) vs. bridged rocker arms (all other
years). Shaft systems have a passage in the block to oil the shaft.
Bridged systems oil the rockers through the pushrods. A bridged rocker
head can be put on a shaft block as the head gasket blocks the oil hole.
Just remember to change to hollow push rods! Mounting a shaft head on a
bridged block would require an external oil line. The line as described in
the TSB to fix an early six (64-65) oiling problem would work nicely, but
there is no real reason to use a shaft head since late model 258 and 4.0L
heads are readily/cheaply available. The reason AMC went back to shafts in
mid 73 was due to a patent dispute with GM over the bridged rocker design.
I don't know how the settlement was reached, but when it was AMC went back
to a bridged design for the 1975 model year.
<snip>
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the second coming of the
shaft rocker setup oil through the push rods? I thought I read that
somewhere but maybe I'm wrong.
Matt
mhaas@xxxxxxx
Cincinnati, OH
http://www.mattsoldcars.com
1967 Rambler American wagon
1968 Rambler American sedan
===============================================================
According to a February survey of Internet holdouts released by
UCLA's Center for Communication Policy, people cite
not having a computer as the No. 1 reason they won't go online.
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin