Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
- From: "Jim Blair" <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:58:55 -0700
A: 700R4 was also used (and it's HIGHLY sought after by rod builders) I was
checking out Advancedadapters website and several of their conversions for
Ford Rangers are using 700R4 from 2.8L family. As for the other stuff, a 3.1
or 3.4L would require a balanced flexplate/flywheel. The 2.8L one is
externally balanced till almost the end of the line.
From: farna@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <ADVANCES62idcDjoYAP000000eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
T-5s and 200R4 trannys were the most common, I don't know what else was used
behind the 2.5/3.1/3.4. I think a four speed (likely T-4) was used as well,
and maybe a three speed (200?) auto. Anything in a Camaro or S-10 2WD with
one of those engines. The FWD and RWD engines use the same trans bolt
pattern, but not all of the FWD engines have the correct engine mount bosses
for a rear drive application. Service replacement 3.1L engines have bosses
for both applications, not sure if a 2.8 or 3.4 were ever cast that way.
That's only a problem if you plan on putting a 3.1 or 3.4 in place of a 2.5
or 2.8 in a Jeep though. Even then it wouldn't be to difficult to fabricate
engine mounts of some sort, would just take some thinking and welding!
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin