Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
- From: Ken Ames <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:55:06 -0600
The 'duke' is 4 x 3 giving 150.7966 cuin and 2.4711 litres. The AMC4 is
3.875x3.1875 giving 150.364cuin and 2.464 litres.
Ken Ames
Quoting Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> A: Okay, the GM motor is 2.5L and the AMC motor is 2.46?
>
>
> From: TABunsey@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: AMC 2.5 only used in Jeeps, right? RIGHT...almost
> To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <ADVANCES62s5tKE6zeI000013aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> John:
>
> You're mostly right.
>
> Per my AMC Parts books and 1983 Service Manual Supplement, AMC introduced
> the 150 (AMC) engine in mid-year 1983, at which time it replaced the Pontiac
>
> "Iron Puke" 151 engine. AMc never bothered to tool up a 150 install for the
> Concords & Spirits because they were already slated to cease production at
> the end of the model year (And, for 1983 the AMC 258 was the standard
> powerplant in the Concord/Spirit anyway).
>
> The AMC 150 became the base engine for 1984 Eagles, but the 4-cylinder was
> dropped for the 1985 model year due to poor sales, as less than 200 Eagles
> were sold in 1984 with the 4-cylinder. It simply wasn't worth the production
>
> line hassles for such miniscule sales.
>
> I have seen several 1983 SX-4s with the AMC 4-cylinder. Actually, I would
> like to find one as a future collectable.
>
>
> Tom Bunsey
>
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin