Re: {FORGED?} Re: Humpster I6 trans
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: {FORGED?} Re: Humpster I6 trans
- From: "Jim Blair" <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:15:31 -0800
A: I suppose in a light enough car and built, the 200R4 would be okay. I
sure wouldn't use one in a full size Jeep that's going to pull some weight!
I may be getting an AW4 to put into my J4000 behind my 304. I figure it'll
handle it fine, since the 304 isn't as strong as a 4.6L stroker. (it's just
the trans controls I'll have fun with!)
Message-Id: <200503031044.AA59637916@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: {FORGED?} Re: Humpster I6 trans
Someone on the AMC Forum runs a manual valve body eguipped 200-4R in an AMC
and loves it.
>From what I've read on them they are the cream of the crop for Overdrive
automatics when built right, Low weight, small size dependable and they
don't suck up a lot of horsepower to run them. They really work well in
retrofits, becasue they don't require space to clear enlarged cases. They
are the same length as a Turbo 350, pretty much a bolt in replacement for
them. I'd still just fine a two wheel drive AW4, It's meant to go behind the
4.0L and doesn't have th efunky 3.08 first gear ration that encourages the
lunging shift to second gear becasue of to much ration spread. Anyone
running a AW4 behind and AMC V-8? I'd like to know how they hold up.
Mark Price
mpriceATwestco.net
Morgantown, WV
69 AMC rambler, 4.0L, EFI, 5 speed
65 Ambassador Conv, 327 AUTO, Basketcase
01 S-10 CREWCRAP 4X4
Jim Blair, Seattle, WA '84 J10 Black Jack (getting lifted and stroked!), '73
J4000 304/TH400/QT tow truck http://www.virtualjeep.com
AMC list subscription options link
http://www.amxfiles.com/amc-list/options.cfm
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin