We re-grind our own cranks and I'll have to tell you I have not noticed any difference in "hardness" of AMC cranks compared to other stock cranks. If you are referring to "Nitriding" or "TuffTriding" I certainly haven't seen ANY AMC cranks like that. Not that there AREN'T any (never say never),,, but I haven't seen them. Could you please give us specific part numbers of these "hardened" cranks? What numbers are they when you start and what are you "hardening" them to? We tried sending Chebby cranks out to be Nitrided ( thinking it was better) back in the 70's. They were straight to start but the process warped them several thousandth's making them unusable. Maybe the process is better now, I haven't had one done in years. It's not really a "strength" process any way. It is a surface hardness process meant to reduce wear. I ran into it again in the late 70's when I started doing a lot of Honda work. All their cranks were Nitrided. But the bearings had worn through the treatment (it's only a few thousandth's thick at most) and needed to be reground. We were told they could NOT be reground and reused unless they were also Nitrided. This is MUCH to expensive a process to use on a stock rebuild like a Honda so we reground them and used them untreated. It was several years before we saw one come back for a rebuild with an untreated crank. Although there WAS more wear to the crank than an untreated one, it HAD worked. In fact MOST stock cranks are NOT Nitrided and work just fine that way. Is Nitriding better? YES it does reduce wear on the crank. I don't believe it's necessary for the average street engine though. It can't be done cheaply enough to justify the cost in my opinion. But hey,,,, that's just me!! Bruce Hevner